Re: [bitfolk] Renumbering: resolver not working? still point…

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Andy Bennett
Date:  
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Renumbering: resolver not working? still points to 212.x, instead of 85.y on >=1 machine

--CUrluEZVXmx7ezWQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Mat,

On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 11:55:39AM +0100, Mat Johns wrote:
> Is it not possible to boot a 32bit Dom1 kernel from a 64bit Dom0?
> Or is the overhead of maintaining the two sets of bootstraps?


The dom0s are already 64-bit, I was just trying to avoid having to
double the number of combinations of install type (and explain to
people which one they want). But feelings seem quite strong both
ways.

Cheers,
Andy

--=20
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting

--CUrluEZVXmx7ezWQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEAREDAAYFAk/POdMACgkQIJm2TL8VSQv4aACgrGjBAE4+y626niu0fPEnDXbE
MNIAmwfa5eUIkX0NwRH+8S7TECdKrKwD
=N0Cm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--CUrluEZVXmx7ezWQ--


From ewan@??? Wed Jun 06 11:16:37 2012
Received: from mail-ob0-f176.google.com ([209.85.214.176])
    by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_MD5:16)
    (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ewan@???>)
    id 1ScEE7-0002yy-Dl
    for users@???; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:16:36 +0000
Received: by obbef5 with SMTP id ef5so14728292obb.21
    for <users@???>; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 04:16:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
    d=nutmegdata.co.uk; s=google;
    h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:from:date
    :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
    bh=N6Ep6HVZLQZTwqz3gIVIkq7MAdukvUBg+S2rUQlJ9LM=;
    b=Ur2ti8gz1WHLokJ0HskjQjzEgAtjQyR3HN3V3c2JSTZxswnZotmYCuIzA+xsvvrQ80
    Ra6+TwzC6KCyxbIvLn6057Rh3SOdoyw+8E7Njo7fFFIquKVBVC/y4joS2S/XSf8IKEOO
    73Ds8fle5+3kDGDrkfHeO/iIPy3fAAQXc/DI8=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
    d=google.com; s=20120113;
    h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:from:date
    :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
    :x-gm-message-state;
    bh=N6Ep6HVZLQZTwqz3gIVIkq7MAdukvUBg+S2rUQlJ9LM=;
    b=XpklH0rdVaND7gNzeH9vJGbnMfyRtfW8AQ5Xo98Rul/MxYnjk/7SJxffzgSHmqjmWY
    Qc30vZcSNc1cebcwy7EdPxZWPjvUJX19c1NTeBPRKnN7P+mPohXVoSyEpHU/BKTglLi1
    QBbhJytgCX783sY0hRNXtiQaMBQHoUNNZK3Dsr5HxzxkOHEF4n6izmzMtId/PIr71PJn
    jFDaEgfz1K0yvCEO7BlNoxn71blXWjT6yJ9+h/f5vudLgJbGzo3rMmo960LjgOc4xZlB
    WyPyo3k6479vKzj0KK8GDanHpQzSuUmkmSYzGg9nV29A9WF134B+vHzBAOF+Y2kRzddg
    U/Vg==
Received: by 10.182.8.99 with SMTP id q3mr19723570oba.63.1338981384438; Wed,
    06 Jun 2012 04:16:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.12.68 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 04:16:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [62.24.245.197]
In-Reply-To: <CAHORQ3cwda6GaKCTsEXOgR4meYbzNaAwU1aAnqJzBVGa3s+nmQ@???>
References: <20120528144346.GX3867@???>
    <4FC3C56E.7030302@???>
    <20120604083741.GB24956@???>
    <CAHORQ3cwda6GaKCTsEXOgR4meYbzNaAwU1aAnqJzBVGa3s+nmQ@???>
From: Ewan Leith <ewan@???>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 12:16:04 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOOtku86o8buDXHpHYsYcYQrP5cm5Z3dm2tT5nOQfXQXT7JgEg@???>
To: users@???
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable