[bitfolk] Renumbering: resolver not working? still points to…

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Max B
Date:  
Subject: [bitfolk] Renumbering: resolver not working? still points to 212.x, instead of 85.y on >=1 machine
s.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 05:41:24 -0000



--DITGHUV3p5DjDsXt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 02:14:21PM +0100, Gerald Davies wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Miah Gregory <miah@???> wrote:
> > I back up the entire disk image personally [=E2=80=A6]


[=E2=80=A6]

> This is what I would like, but I thought it would put an overhead on
> the service provided for everyone if everyone backed up using this
> approach.


At the moment the only metric we're charging by for the backups is
the disk space used, so this sort of thing is really for me to worry
about.

Bear in mind if just backing up the filesystem with rsync then
data inside the memory of applications (e.g. pending changes in
databases like MySQL) may not get backed up properly. So you
probably want additional stuff to dump that data out consistently or
whatever.

While BitFolk's backup solution is designed to be fairly simple and
only uses rsync, if you're doing your own solution then you can back
up a VPS the same way that you back up any host, so just think about
how you normally do it.

Cheers,
Andy

--=20
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting

--DITGHUV3p5DjDsXt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEAREDAAYFAk/O7VEACgkQIJm2TL8VSQseDACgpcti524m/cltUj71kJ5vdl5r
LQoAoJqFhOkCxfZ5BeaDIV5BIQ9DpLfT
=BD2U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--DITGHUV3p5DjDsXt--


From john@??? Wed Jun 06 06:48:57 2012
Received: from [2001:ba8:1f1:f187::2] (helo=nimbus.sinodun.org.uk)
    by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
    (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <john@???>) id 1ScA2z-0007hY-9z
    for users@???; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 06:48:51 +0000
Received: from ntp.sinodun.org.uk ([81.187.217.217] helo=[10.3.0.55])
    by nimbus.sinodun.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
    (envelope-from <john@???>) id 1ScA2t-0003ff-R2
    for users@???; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 07:48:45 +0100
Message-ID: <4FCEFD46.9000906@???>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 07:48:38 +0100
From: John Winters <john@???>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
    rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20120506 Icedove/3.0.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@???
References: <20120530190217.GB11695@???>    <20120530222751.GC11695@???>    <20120531024807.GD11695@???>    <20120531051054.GE11695@???>    <20120604082935.GA24956@???>    <20120605015149.GK11695@???>    <4FCDCA55.1040101@???>
    <20120605092254.GQ11695@???>    <1338900821.9733.3.camel@???>
    <3589626192402882828@unknownmsgid>
In-Reply-To: <3589626192402882828@unknownmsgid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-bitfolk.com-Metrics-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for
    2001:ba8:1f1:f187::2 (failed)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Wed,
    06 Jun 2012 06:48:51 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:ba8:1f1:f187::2
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    spamd0.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: AS20712 81.187.0.0/16
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
    shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches
    handover relay *      domain
    * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] backups (was Re: hardware problems on barbar,
 1826Z and ongoing)
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 06:49:06 -0000


On 05/06/12 14:10, S P wrote:
> Miah, would you mind sharing your approach for backing up the entire
> image? I am new to VPS backing up, and am searching for a good
> approach.


It's worth taking a look at dirvish - available as a standard package in
Debian.

It builds on top of rsync to enable you to keep multiple complete
snapshots of a system. I use a dedicated backup box, with RAID1 disks,
to take backups of a number of systems including my Bitfolk virtual server.

John


From simon@??? Wed Jun 06 09:39:56 2012
Received: from mail.calmblue.net ([92.243.6.179])
    by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
    (envelope-from <simon@???>) id 1ScCiV-0006i0-07
    for users@???; Wed, 06 Jun 2012 09:39:55 +0000
Received: from [10.0.4.224] (mail.interserve.org.uk [81.187.17.242])
    by mail.calmblue.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78ECC3F37
    for <users@???>; Wed,  6 Jun 2012 11:39:41 +0200 (CEST)
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.0.4 mail.calmblue.net 78ECC3F37
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=calmblue.net;
    s=default; t=1338975583;
    bh=/6pU2W0LbvfXhLdz3D