--2qXFWqzzG3v1+95a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 01:13:44PM +0000, Andy Smith wrote:
> I'm looking to replace it with apt-cacher-ng but I'd like to test it
> some more first.
[...]
> No need to let me know if it works for you, only if it doesn't work
> for you. :)
Actually, I've got a success case that you'd probably be interested
in.
Due to a slight case of using the wrong xterm, I managed to switch
over my desktop machine at home instead of my VPS. I'm happy to report
that it currently works quite cheerfully from an arbitrary location on
the internet. :)
Hugo.
--
=== Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk ===
PGP key: 515C238D from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk
--- UNIX: Italian pen maker. ---
--2qXFWqzzG3v1+95a
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFPvpPZIKyzvlFcI40RAiL0AJ9rnyhZDehmHPrvwUD3HNxBTpO9VQCgh8qK
8pcMwNzuZozzoNtIeDLSaLY=
=berA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--2qXFWqzzG3v1+95a--
From andy@??? Thu May 24 20:07:50 2012
Received: from andy by mail.bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1SXeK6-000526-20
for users@???; Thu, 24 May 2012 20:07:50 +0000
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 20:07:50 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20120524200749.GS3867@???>
References: <20120524131344.GS12360@???>
<20120524200233.GE31037@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qfesBOB4TKwppX3D"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120524200233.GE31037@???>
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Thu,
24 May 2012 20:07:50 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andy@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd2.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RELAYS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Testing out apt-cacher-ng for Debian/Ubuntu package
caching
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 20:07:50 -0000
--qfesBOB4TKwppX3D
Conte
