On Thu, 24 May 2012 13:13:44 +0000
Andy Smith <andy@???> wrote:
> If you're a customer running Debian or Ubuntu then you're most
> likely making use of our apt-cacher. The apt-cacher is quite an old
> version, has a few small problems, and doesn't support IPv6.
>
> I'm looking to replace it with apt-cacher-ng but I'd like to test it
> some more first.
>
> If you'd like to help test it, please could you replace any instance
> of "apt-cacher" in your /etc/apt/sources.list with "test-cacher"?
OK
I won't tell you if it works ;-)
--
John Lewis
Debian & the GeneWeb genealogical data server
From miah@??? Thu May 24 13:27:07 2012
Received: from n01.darksilence.net ([2001:41c8:1:5c06::10])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <miah@???>)
id 1SXY4J-0004gj-GS
for users@???; Thu, 24 May 2012 13:27:07 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by n01.darksilence.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED01E98171
for <users@???>; Thu, 24 May 2012 14:27:06 +0100 (BST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at darksilence.net
Received: from n01.darksilence.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (n01.darksilence.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id RF1XYFgbmCcu for <users@???>;
Thu, 24 May 2012 14:27:06 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [192.168.168.157] (188-220-36-211.zone11.bethere.co.uk
[188.220.36.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by n01.darksilence.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F49E98167
for <users@???>; Thu, 24 May 2012 14:27:06 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <1337866025.5051.24.camel@???>
From: Miah Gregory <miah@???>
To: users@???
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 14:27:05 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20120524142520.3efe08f2@???>
References: <20120524131344.GS12360@???>
<20120524142520.3efe08f2@???>
Organization: Dark Silence Ltd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2-1+b1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Thu,
24 May 2012 13:27:07 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:41c8:1:5c06::10
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: miah@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd1.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,
T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
* -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
* domain * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Testing out apt-cacher-ng for Debian/Ubuntu package
caching
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 13:27:08 -0000
+1
Seems faster to me, too.
--
Regards,
Miah
DSIS - IT Support and Consultancy
0141 4382030
http://www.dsis.co.uk/
DSIS is a trading name of Dark Silence Ltd, registered in Scotland SC341532
-----Original Message-----
From: john lewis <zen57162@???>
To: users@???
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Testing out apt-cacher-ng for Debian/Ubuntu
package caching
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 14:25:20 +0100
Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
On Thu, 24 May 2012 13:13:44 +0000
Andy Smith <andy@???> wrote:
> If you're a customer running Debian or Ubuntu then you're most
> likely making use of our apt-cacher. The apt-cacher is quite an old
> version, has a few small problems, and doesn't support IPv6.
>
> I'm looking to replace it with apt-cacher-ng but I'd like to test it
> some more first.
>
> If you'd like to help test it, please could you replace any instance
> of "apt-cacher" in your /etc/apt/sources.list with "test-cacher"?
OK
I won't tell you if it works ;-)
From jgxenite@??? Thu May 24 13:28:44 2012
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f48.google.com ([209.85.215.48])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jgxenite@???>) id 1SXY5s-0004sd-4S
for users@???; Thu, 24 May 2012 13:28:44 +0000
Received: by lagz14 with SMTP id z14so8609532lag.21
for <users@???>; Thu, 24 May 2012 06:28:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc
:content-type; bh=Xh+ygI3mMkix0XEOHHpLB1D7WS2qZC4PhYX8gtsBARg=;
b=ewrOg56BRIDbpKbOD6+hz1raCGbofNG96Ot8Sdo1/nazZs5QYwt8RhuYuxijm7ukTS
SzLxuUNNtFFF6LGgLY4QzXoMdSSDLCVCQpGu/clE3R1TxSeZXdHNF9097/bIh9unsqCJ
0n/rZwM+7BmA+5aP8v2ueUCSo8sCXVfUjbW9lO116UKfwpcEpKLmi0czfmCYFAOKVSX/
mdiuxJOWYclYmJ8f83Q+KkPBb85DlHOckSSiLdnWCTT4duwtrGN3+Bwz7fas47zZd/o/
w9cwLfKx5/26rQegF37UzWAZh1x1rXeIOMXABZP6Q9ZA+UU/WRBq069pNhzjBO4Y/Aun
3qmA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.51.228 with SMTP id n4mr13650925lbo.35.1337866117928; Thu,
24 May 2012 06:28:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.75.98 with HTTP; Thu, 24 May 2012 06:28:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1337866025.5051.24.camel@???>
References: <20120524131344.GS12360@???>
<20120524142520.3efe08f2@???>
<1337866025.5051.24.camel@???>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 14:28:37 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJDzH8it5h29xi+gFSG4nOpzvDVtAYG9ned_YYWb5rhzDA4OMA@???>
From: James Gregory <jgxenite@???>
Cc: users@???
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Thu,
24 May 2012 13:28:44 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.215.48
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jgxenite@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd2.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
DKIM_VALID_AU, MISSING_HEADERS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at
http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust
* [209.85.215.48 listed in list.dnswl.org]
* -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
* 1.2 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's * domain
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
* 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
* valid
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Testing out apt-cacher-ng for Debian/Ubuntu package
caching
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 13:28:44 -0000
Seems to work OK to me.
Did seem to initially fail as it was trying to connect over IPv6, and
I'm not sure IPv6 is correctly configured on VM. Once I disabled IPv6,
it seemed to work OK.
On 24 May 2012 14:27, Miah Gregory <miah@???> wrote:
> +1
> Seems faster to me, too.
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Miah
>
> DSIS - IT Support and Consultancy
> 0141 4382030
> http://www.dsis.co.uk/
> DSIS is a trading name of Dark Silence Ltd, registered in Scotland SC341532
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: john lewis <zen57162@???>
> To: users@???
> Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Testing out apt-cacher-ng for Debian/Ubuntu
> package caching
> Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 14:25:20 +0100
> Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 13:13:44 +0000
> Andy Smith <andy@???> wrote:
>
>> If you're a customer running Debian or Ubuntu then you're most
>> likely making use of our apt-cacher. The apt-cacher is quite an old
>> version, has a few small problems, and doesn't support IPv6.
>>
>> I'm looking to replace it with apt-cacher-ng but I'd like to test it
>> some more first.
>>
>> If you'd like to help test it, please could you replace any instance
>> of "apt-cacher" in your /etc/apt/sources.list with "test-cacher"?
>
> OK
>
> I won't tell you if it works ;-)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users@???
