> This was unrelated to yesterday's problem.
>
> It seems that Rackspace deaggregated their /19 into thirty one /24s:
>
> http://www.ris.ripe.net/dashboard/209.20.64.0/19
>
> and Jump does not accept /24 announcements. I've got them to put an
> exception in and have asked Rackspace to put a covering route, so it
> works now.
They do if that was the size of the allocation, the problem is with
deaggregation, not the size of the announcement, iirc
From keithwilliamsnp@??? Mon May 21 17:46:57 2012
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f48.google.com ([209.85.215.48])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <keithwilliamsnp@???>)
id 1SWWh6-0002NU-8b
for users@???; Mon, 21 May 2012 17:46:57 +0000
Received: by lagz14 with SMTP id z14so5364619lag.21
for <users@???>; Mon, 21 May 2012 10:46:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=zij2+s7pj/sTmil4VV3uRiOfctBehbRrR3in/Kyw4wc=;
b=otc6rGYKx/A/4WF3FamyX9mpb2QXemmqaieYtLIXTuwqo1UBeBNCtfyZ3Ht8aQCek5
grc+szHSlmKU0FEFIuhEA5Cs5vzNSedtUZBYGLwbsKpPfKFbtxc7wk9Tufv9LxNO9BDG
TY0I7pz1AAi+ivrSkzRTkVDI5+5bDVb1wSUszOhqETuY81ljh3LM4ykE5b4V3SE++RI8
0WQCCVNQewsbQvyX5f29+NBj/UkudsDU3IHCs/81v5lO+ACHrWNmarhzHX2twVTcyxzD
GEKgVyP9250DV/UBH9gjyma/7UVwXLaNJxhS7J6Jt1gC9R0u0tLanodQvNs1hBjtxOLD
O8Hg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.162.68 with SMTP id xy4mr20614698lab.49.1337622409627;
Mon, 21 May 2012 10:46:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.152.148.133 with HTTP; Mon, 21 May 2012 10:46:49 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 18:46:49 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMe3QpMZggDHhX6e=5K0+ag0c6R_TD5P5WK8sLaZKuZE1hzg=w@???>
From: Keith Williams <keithwilliamsnp@???>
To: users@???
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0442682291c77604c08f7cf9
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Mon,
21 May 2012 17:46:56 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.215.48
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: keithwilliamsnp@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd1.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
* -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
low * trust * [209.85.215.48 listed in list.dnswl.org]
* 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's * domain
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
* 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
* valid
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: [bitfolk] Squeeze Bind9
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 17:46:57 -0000
--f46d0442682291c77604c08f7cf9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I have just moved from Lenny to Squeeze. I did it the cowards way by
shifting from one VPS to another, taking up Bitfolk's 2 weeks offer. It all
went extremely well except for one problem that I have just solved after
hours searching logs, uninstalling and reinstalling etc. Thought I ought to
post it here in case anyone else hits the same problem. (When I have done
my other VPS I'll add this to the Wiki)
I found that I could not get rndc to work. This led to very intermittent
failure to allow transfers to slave servers. I had all the correct
permissions and keys and everything in the right place. I had iptables set
up to allow input on lo and from 127.0.0.1. In the end, I had to set up an
explicit rule in iptables to allow input from 127.0.0.1 to 127.0.0.1 port
953. Never saw this on lenny nor on an "offsite" squeeze machine. I can't
understand why this time it needed that one explicit rule. Anyway, all's
well that ends well and it is now all working perfectly
Keith
--
Keith Williams
Anybody caught selling macrame in public should be dyed a natural color and
hung out to dry. - Calvin Trillin
He's doing it again!
www.justgiving.com/France-The-Wrong-Way
Tailor Made English
www.tmenglish.org
--f46d0442682291c77604c08f7cf9
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div>I have just moved from Lenny to Squeeze. I did it the cowards way by s=
hifting from one VPS to another, taking up Bitfolk's 2 weeks offer. It =
all went extremely well except for one problem that I have just solved afte=
r hours searching logs, uninstalling and reinstalling etc. Thought I ought =
to post it here in case anyone else hits the same problem. (When I have don=
e my other VPS I'll add this to the Wiki)</div>
<div>=A0</div><div>I found that I could not get rndc to work. This led to=
=A0 very=A0intermittent failure to allow transfers to slave servers. I had =
all the correct permissions and keys and everything in the right place. I h=
ad iptables set up to allow input on lo and from 127.0.0.1. In the end, I h=
ad to set up an explicit rule in iptables to allow input from 127.0.0.1 to =
127.0.0.1 port 953. Never saw this on lenny nor on an "offsite" s=
queeze machine. I can't understand why this time it needed that one exp=
licit rule. Anyway, all's well that ends well and it is now all working=
perfectly</div>
<div>=A0</div><div>Keith<br clear=3D"all"><br>-- <br></div><div>Keith Willi=
ams</div><div>=A0</div><div>Anybody caught selling macrame in public should=
be dyed a natural color and hung=20
out to dry. - Calvin Trillin</div><div>=A0</div><div>He's doing it agai=
n! <a href=3D"
http://www.justgiving.com/France-The-Wrong-Way" target=3D"_bl=
ank">
www.justgiving.com/France-The-Wrong-Way</a></div><div>=A0</div><div>Ta=
ilor Made English=A0=A0 <a href=3D"
http://www.tmenglish.org" target=3D"_bla=
nk">
www.tmenglish.org</a></div>
<div>=A0</div><div><dt>=A0</dt></div><br>
--f46d0442682291c77604c08f7cf9--
From announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@??? Thu May 24 10:09:43 2012
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bitfolk.com)
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from
<announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@???>)
id 1SXUzH-0002F7-Fy
for users@???; Thu, 24 May 2012 10:09:43 +0000
Received: from andy by mail.bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1SXUzE-0002E5-Vb
for announce@???; Thu, 24 May 2012 10:09:41 +0000
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 10:09:40 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: announce@???
Message-ID: <20120524100940.GP12360@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Thu,
24 May 2012 10:09:40 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd0.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RELAYS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
X-BeenThere: announce@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1861391234=="
Sender: announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@???
