Re: [bitfolk] Redundancy options

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Nigel Rantor
Date:  
To: users
Old-Topics: Re: [bitfolk] A gentle reminder again about protecting against SSH dictionary attacks
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Redundancy options
On 10/05/2012 18:36, Dom Latter wrote:

> These are my security measures:
>
> PermitRootLogin no
> AllowUsers foo bar baz


Mine too, plus TCP Wrappers to only permit addresses from a couple of
subnets.

Mike


From keithwilliamsnp@??? Sat May 12 22:10:06 2012
Received: from mail-lb0-f176.google.com ([209.85.217.176])
    by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
    (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <keithwilliamsnp@???>)
    id 1STKVp-0001kR-Dv
    for users@???; Sat, 12 May 2012 22:10:06 +0000
Received: by lboj14 with SMTP id j14so3694037lbo.21
    for <users@???>; Sat, 12 May 2012 15:09:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
    h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
    bh=STg7li6QdX65rXiJ4OxojvBvuhxVJ8WQGWQor9VhK/k=;
    b=a0arHsAiOcem7KeICDeJtlyClccNJfEf0FxhPHiwH9qjs8jGZUxJQc2k4H4thtCviB
    JO4//yeJINOd8am4snMG6QTAWSP35COuhzxi99LpvoCyTHyHP+1E/BGHZWDHRYkfHsAq
    rBJ5806k4JC6S5U40bxKSOy9mUg8AnbpWwKY3WDIppcoZbcJX2P+2XCvVAGhSFiTLR/O
    7XaAJ3IsR+3TqyX4N6+3x68pmDUrgz9eFJ3ylykrtODPsxWBCube/G31lRq5lGjUvZ/5
    XPa/RdNuIrRUYxl4Zb4avrJOzCYKNaBz7S/AEX8cVZa9I9Or8qvrBOihZdl5xkbBjnWf
    py6w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.129.74 with SMTP id nu10mr2880169lab.50.1336860597122;
    Sat, 12 May 2