icky issues around the possibility of a bug,
mistake or hostile user injecting arbitrary IPs into the system
causing everyone to ban those IPs.
I can see how someone with multiple machines might want a site-wide
block list, but I'm not sure it is worth it for use by multiple
different admins. You'd have to put a lot of effort into securing
it. Seems easier to just protect yourself with the more conventional
ways.
Cheers,
Andy
=B9
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIDR#Subnet_masks
--=20
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
--IuJpT0rwbUevm2bB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREDAAYFAk+r+6EACgkQIJm2TL8VSQt2jACgwB/TR97CPQBHbSV48Kq+KTmZ
SDoAoIZ23pioPzfRUq7+EKfQKjVkx8/l
=cDUm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--IuJpT0rwbUevm2bB--
From bitfolk-users@??? Thu May 10 17:36:17 2012
Received: from dogfood4.lampservers.net ([85.119.83.97])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <bitfolk-users@???>) id 1SSXHl-0002kj-Qr
for users@???; Thu, 10 May 2012 17:36:17 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by dogfood4.lampservers.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 378CD281C5
for <users@???>; Thu, 10 May 2012 17:36:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from dogfood4.lampservers.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (dogfood4.lampservers.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
port 10024) with ESMTP id 3SV0v0YLziDa for <users@???>;
Thu, 10 May 2012 17:36:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.6] (cpc1-cmbg5-0-0-cust882.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com
[81.98.255.115]) (Authenticated sender: dom@???)
by dogfood4.lampservers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F9FD281C4
for <users@???>; Thu, 10 May 2012 17:36:16 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4FABFC8F.5060407@???>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 18:36:15 +0100
From: Dom Latter <bitfolk-users@???>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/2.0.0.24 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@???
References: <20120510162331.GG12360@???>
<20120510175044.29f33d38@derek>
In-Reply-To: <20120510175044.29f33d38@derek>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Thu,
10 May 2012 17:36:17 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 85.119.83.97
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: bitfolk-users@???
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.bitfolk.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
