Re: [bitfolk] Small issue related to renumbering

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Paul Stimpson
Date:  
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Small issue related to renumbering
er a
stable system.


From announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@??? Thu May 10 16:23:36 2012
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bitfolk.com)
    by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from
    <announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@???>)
    id 1SSW9Q-0007Od-K0
    for users@???; Thu, 10 May 2012 16:23:36 +0000
Received: from andy by mail.bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
    (envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1SSW9L-0007NZ-NA
    for announce@???; Thu, 10 May 2012 16:23:31 +0000
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 16:23:31 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: announce@???
Message-ID: <20120510162331.GG12360@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Thu,
    10 May 2012 16:23:31 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    spamd0.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RELAYS shortcircuit=no
    autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
X-BeenThere: announce@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1618425340=="
Sender: announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@???
Errors-To: announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@???
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Thu,
    10 May 2012 16:23:36 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: announce-bounces+users=lists.bitfolk.com@???
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.bitfolk.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Subject: [bitfolk] A gentle reminder again about protecting against SSH
    dictionary    attacks
X-BeenThere: users@???
Reply-To: users@???
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 16:23:36 -0000



--===============1618425340==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
    protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Y+Z5jE7Arku/2GrR"
Content-Disposition: inline



--Y+Z5jE7Arku/2GrR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

It's been a while since I last posted a reminder about protecting
against SSH dictionary attacks.

http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/message/20100314.085112.f5be7da9.en.html

The problem of course has not gone away and since then there have
been many more compromises that could have been easily avoided.

So, please, if you are running sshd on port 22 and allowing password
authentication, please consider taking some steps to protec