2lbb.21
for <users@???>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 04:07:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type; bh=Uy4JicuR6qwMuDl7A/Sg+uswAEJuDy3fyhg/E0GcERQ=;
b=y4Z1NoY2vxyVrTRfHbUYEnpZMhH7zbGglOptR6iUPbADImTmeZtkw9rjjT88tX/zfZ
6oopL9NMeNGud3SYedh3npnrEmzv/fZBACdnRyt0NqGO2G3ckTyqRnD7nz8SWVogJNS0
vChesLJQgw1Gq5BER0qujKn+D6fxBSnRvQk4BMpl2bNbHqQc/EFVqMXTxRVMEsdKLWND
hSq04YoO85bFVXm1LXZZxpBERwzrha95bG4w0OS4PowjNq83tzuPYJPnsTkv0WzSj60k
omtdSh/ngxvzehJJ25RqBGz4wZDdaBLjQbF0QQ7alyTEb/f72OegnaEw9HizRNrU6IPP
iHfg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.8.168 with SMTP id s8mr2681745lba.90.1334142468294; Wed,
11 Apr 2012 04:07:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.152.111.9 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 04:07:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201204111044.q3BAinXL029755@???>
References: <201204111044.q3BAinXL029755@???>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:07:48 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMe3QpN0fYW_O3U4vOUsaS6aLVgteeRQ0sW7yLKU_BMjPjxC8Q@???>
From: Keith Williams <keithwilliamsnp@???>
To: users@???
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e0cb4efe2bc0e709d704bd653fd4
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Wed,
11 Apr 2012 11:07:54 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.217.176
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: keithwilliamsnp@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
low * trust
* [209.85.217.176 listed in list.dnswl.org]
* -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
* 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's * domain
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
* 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
* valid
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Nagios warning
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:07:55 -0000
--e0cb4efe2bc0e709d704bd653fd4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
OK Ta,
So I will trawl through all the logs for the time when I did the destroy
and look for what processes were killed by the system
Thanks
On 11 April 2012 11:44, Deanna Earley <dee@???> wrote:
> Thus sounds like the out of memory killer. You should find at least a few
> entries in the system log detailing what was killed and why.
>
> Where this is logged on a Debian system, I don't know.
>
> --
> Deanna Earley
>
>
> ----- Reply message -----
> From: "Keith Williams" <keithwilliamsnp@???>
> To: <users@???>
> Subject: [bitfolk] Nagios
