[209.85.217.176])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <keithwilliamsnp@???>)
id 1SHunN-0005IA-3w
for users@???; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 10:29:01 +0000
Received: by lbbgm13 with SMTP id gm13so226898lbb.21
for <users@???>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 03:28:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type; bh=cKoQ14OMcpmc3SMLPcgrdUYvfT+dLvz/CrrN54iTUnY=;
b=x0mZ7a6+Ix+0emiDjb3mQ+0/RKMI9OXQ/fi2PPrVfalNmBq3X5ZMPb9CE8Vm36h/M6
nBogLrEGLl0Iw8W9RMpV8GP3Xy5VAW8sxrTuwUl42SYNvQJKMSuFHGOKh828xLJdrvz7
WnppEwGyQIwGcEoWfG7SxptRl7r7Q8itsRBIWtOIk+auMj0uB6Tn2R+5AuQ242Qweli3
smyxd/reLDdZD0TcZNyUOFIvfMjfHWe7rdTT+oOu38zZg68Z+TVpi9XdEHBAv48w5IAB
amHCP6Ki77g/od0T3dHuD+Q8sutpjIE1eo09XMDLcJIfSe5B0A1YmyR2ySNl0DyxyBUQ
9LcA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.9.70 with SMTP id x6mr2660108lba.62.1334140135231; Wed, 11
Apr 2012 03:28:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.152.111.9 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 03:28:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4F8556A0.6050207@???>
References: <CAMe3QpOfGLKyjiSPWTiQEAnH9p_SCPb6zCAJiS2rA7b+6WVzUg@???>
<4F8556A0.6050207@???>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:28:55 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMe3QpMB7DtMquoL_zHeeU_jBzrDe=-WhXajgM7q=yS4qbTgfw@???>
From: Keith Williams <keithwilliamsnp@???>
To: users@???
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=485b390f7b88d752a704bd64b46c
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Wed,
11 Apr 2012 10:29:01 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.217.176
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: keithwilliamsnp@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd1.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
low * trust
* [209.85.217.176 listed in list.dnswl.org]
* -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
* 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's * domain
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
* 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
* valid
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Nagios warning
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 10:29:03 -0000
--485b390f7b88d752a704bd64b46c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi Andy,
I'm running Debian Lenny. (I know I should have upgraded by now!)
I hav
