Re: [bitfolk] does bitfolk block smtp from t-mobile ip addre…

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Kevin Whelan
Date:  
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] does bitfolk block smtp from t-mobile ip addresses?
;If knowledge can create problems, it is n=
ot through ignorance that we can solve=20
them.&quot; Isaac Asimov</div><div>=A0</div><div>He&#39;s doing it again! <=
a href=3D"http://www.justgiving.com/France-The-Wrong-Way" target=3D"_blank"=
>www.justgiving.com/France-The-Wrong-Way</a></div><div>=A0</div><div>Tailor=

Made English=A0=A0 <a href=3D"http://www.tmenglish.org" target=3D"_blank">=
www.tmenglish.org</a></div>
<div>=A0</div><div><dt>=A0</dt></div><br>

--e89a8f22c72b9f072904bd640ffc--


From andyjpb@??? Wed Apr 11 10:02:15 2012
Received: from pavilion.ashurst.eu.org ([85.119.82.45])
    by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
    (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <andyjpb@???>)
    id 1SHuNT-00041d-4Z
    for users@???; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 10:02:15 +0000
Received: from [74.125.57.178] (helo=[192.168.147.174])
    by pavilion.ashurst.eu.org with esmtpsa
    (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72)
    (envelope-from <andyjpb@???>)
    id 1SHuNR-0007vs-RA; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:02:14 +0100
Message-ID: <4F8556A0.6050207@???>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:02:08 +0100
From: Andy Bennett <andyjpb@???>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
    rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20120207 Icedove/3.0.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Keith Williams <keithwilliamsnp@???>
References: <CAMe3QpOfGLKyjiSPWTiQEAnH9p_SCPb6zCAJiS2rA7b+6WVzUg@???>
In-Reply-To: <CAMe3QpOfGLKyjiSPWTiQEAnH9p_SCPb6zCAJiS2rA7b+6WVzUg@???>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    admin.kwak.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT
    shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT Not all rules were run, due to a shortcircuited rule
    * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Wed,
    11 Apr 2012 10:02:15 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 85.119.82.45
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andyjpb@???
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.bitfolk.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: users@???
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Nagios warning
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 10:02:15 -0000


Hi,

> I have scanned the logs this morning trying to find out what had gone
> wrong. I realise it was something going haywire and consuming all the
> resources, but please could anyone give me pointers on how to determine
> what it was that was behaving so badly?


Which distro are you running?
Which files have you looked at in /var/log ?





Regards,
@ndy

--
andyjpb@???
http://www.ashurst.eu.org/
0x7EBA75FF



From keithwilliamsnp@??? Wed Apr 11 10:29:03 2012
Received: from mail-lb0-f176.google.com ([209.85.217.176])
    by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
    (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <keithwilliamsnp@???>)
    id 1SHunN-0005IA-3w
    for users@???; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 10:29:01 +0000
Received: by lbbgm13 with SMTP id gm13so226898lbb.21
    for <users@???>; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 03:28:55 -0700 (PDT)