-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREDAAYFAk9zHwsACgkQIJm2TL8VSQvV3QCgxgiWWK2YCU/6NAr67wtuSdWJ
RHsAnijFbFHgxUJyv4QCcsuyYZDRH0Gt
=XMmx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Jbyekxk18hnEXT0m--
From murray.crane@??? Wed Mar 28 14:41:36 2012
Received: from mail-ee0-f48.google.com ([74.125.83.48])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <murray.crane@???>)
id 1SCu47-0008GU-5e
for users@???; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:41:36 +0000
Received: by eeke49 with SMTP id e49so391952eek.21
for <users@???>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 07:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type; bh=GXL/kCc/sio2pzXwIsVHnnIWwnAVBXvMbShSIc9ynDE=;
b=SJ8KQGNQeb6qy6lx3qs6aoyvkoVK+W4EKw1AScETcQRP3kd0/MXhFNWeGiGjP7D24F
GPxFL0UVt5zhbv7Ir1s0vfpzaHgPEQgAEGrWTS3OQjaAhMEJRq3OkviRHzqKQc4hYHE6
O9XjNDIjQ8bVxJ6hdhEZpkY25QJ3m/AxH4jHhTWMEh5xp08T2CVsBQMHkG5RlXK71Lnc
dW2ghpuuPdKuZ07myTzLMKntDD/+sZEphI9u8AUkE6AcieUKHOnHr0qTk+JW5mplOiTV
7Q6unR9dBEMj8lKTgFqpNifWCY4FRSZF4Z1HwcdrETFu23hOXN48nnU//McefLCnoJkO
gKhQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.110.193 with SMTP id ic1mr23588089lab.4.1332945688702;
Wed, 28 Mar 2012 07:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.152.3.103 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 07:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120328142411.GL4154@???>
References: <CAAiW_G=jDZe0=9UTOvE5CtAd7vdRVEpEamRv273LSPMTrrtBrw@???>
<20120328142411.GL4154@???>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:41:28 +0100
Message-ID: <CAAiW_GnLUFRhGUeyjpXRsT8ki=PNHEi09Bp6Omto0X3ie58SgQ@???>
From: Murray Crane <murray.crane@???>
To: users@???,
andy@???
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04083b0f47af5804bc4e9a4a
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Wed,
28 Mar 2012 14:41:35 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 74.125.83.48
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: murray.crane@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
admin.kwak.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 74.125.0.0/16
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
low * trust * [74.125.83.48 listed in list.dnswl.org]
* -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
* 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's * domain
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
* 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
* valid
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Enabling Monkeysphere
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:41:36 -0000
--f46d04083b0f47af5804bc4e9a4a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
TBH, for only one of the three it's been a couple of hours; it's under an
hour for the other two.
Best course right now would appear to be to not panic and let time be time.
I've yet to lock down SSHD to key-only in all three cases, so I'm not
losing anything as yet (other than the additional security).
Kind regards
Murray Crane
On 28 March 2012 15:24, Andy Smith <andy@???> wrote:
> Hi Murray,
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:15:08PM +0100, Murray Crane wrote:
> > # monkeysphere-host publish-key
> >
> > Isn't sending my key(s) to the keyserver mentioned (
> pool.sks-keyservers.net),
> > because using their web-based search tool I can't find any of the (now
> > three) keys I've published.
>
> pool.sks-keyservers.net is a big set of individual servers and your
> client will just pick one to send to and to receive from. Sometimes
> it can take a while for them to distribute keys between each other.
> Have you waited a few hours before checking again?
>
> Cheers,
> Andy
>
> --
> http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEAREDAAYFAk9zHwsACgkQIJm2TL8VSQvV3QCgxgiWWK2YCU/6NAr67wtuSdWJ
> RHsAnijFbFHgxUJyv4QCcsuyYZDRH0Gt
> =XMmx
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users@???
> https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
--f46d04083b0f47af5804bc4e9a4a
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
TBH, for only one of the three it's been a couple of hours; it's un=
der an hour for the other two. <br><br>Best course right now would appear t=
o be to not panic and let time be time. I've yet to lock down SSHD to k=
ey-only in all three cases, so I'm not losing anything as yet (other th=
an the additional security).<br>
<br clear=3D"all">Kind regards<br><br>Murray Crane<br><br>
<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 28 March 2012 15:24, Andy Smith <span=
dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"
mailto:andy@bitfolk.com">andy@???</a>&g=
t;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0=
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi Murray,<br>
<div class=3D"im"><br>
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:15:08PM +0100, Murray Crane wrote:<br>
> # monkeysphere-host publish-key<br>
><br>
> Isn't sending my key(s) to the keyserver mentioned (<a href=3D"htt=
p://pool.sks-keyservers.net" target=3D"_blank">pool.sks-keyservers.net</a>)=
,<br>
> because using their web-based search tool I can't find any of the =
(now<br>
> three) keys I've published.<br>
<br>
</div><a href=3D"
http://pool.sks-keyservers.net" target=3D"_blank">pool.sks=
-keyservers.net</a> is a big set of individual servers and your<br>
client will just pick one to send to and to receive from. Sometimes<br>
it can take a while for them to distribute keys between each other.<br>
Have you waited a few hours before checking again?<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Andy<br>
<span class=3D
