v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type; bh=hWluMl9ZRTAwpKP4h3wum4e+DhM6rtUjeWGS6stm584=;
b=eAbL6A7zMC3stv14lZ8ElroJU+1STZAE8+yCbS1TNN31JF1RYlxBObigwBUOgzUja3
tCPa3Dvn1AElXwLe9j04MOaXL4D3c4qqDF65k4VBhe6zcRGn071gtgFRjVEG6jYWE7+X
/BjFbiVrvjTgtP9wuYnYrfogSlhppTvVRUextuPtXW8yKceqhSBttaIuX1O67v29vM15
C+ZyxYbYuynuqoXgW79l+chlWn53MYgpk8k/20sfm0ebOrFEeesP1bQlPio+HJV8Tbd3
S0oNCbIcT4QOv1DtC34L+xm25KsT/ZEX0fsaOFUjo0ZixSa201q1FUABKkp+2bbxk+F8
iTpA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.131.3 with SMTP id oi3mr328548lab.35.1331680923311; Tue,
13 Mar 2012 16:22:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.130.196 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:22:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOOtku__64qsUkjy1cs8LzmojF5ZcxEUhweBGyfZdT5oOsXUgA@???>
References: <CAL7LUj_b6aigz68cr2BwTLY61h7xQr_j9PrYw26Or69Wzq4a1A@???>
<CAOOtku__64qsUkjy1cs8LzmojF5ZcxEUhweBGyfZdT5oOsXUgA@???>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 19:22:03 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL7LUj8J4GxO4EXCKJYuZxaQQ44fJgfEg_ViUEjUn5KKfmrqnw@???>
From: S P <sundancecloud@???>
To: users@???
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04308a28635f2a04bb282093
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Tue,
13 Mar 2012 23:22:09 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.217.176
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: sundancecloud@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd2.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
low * trust
* [209.85.217.176 listed in list.dnswl.org]
* -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
* 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's * domain
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
* 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
* valid
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Suggestions for email hosting company
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 23:22:10 -0000
--f46d04308a28635f2a04bb282093
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks everyone for all your tips. I knew I'd get informed opinions from
this list.
The dovecot site has companies that appear to be quite good. I wish more of
the Swedish and Finnish sites were in English ... I would have been very
interested.
I think simplymailsolutions.com would be ideal for me for a straight email
site.
However, I notice that if I transfer my domain to gandi, they provide very
good email hosting free with the domain.
So, I've found my solution: a mixture of gandi and simplymailsolutions.
I'll try one domain on gandi to see how it works out.
- Sandy
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Ewan Leith <ewan@???> wrote:
> SimplyMail do some good email deals, their basic option sounds suitable
> for what you want, and is =A312 a year. If you want a good web interface,=
try
> their zimbra option, but it's relatively pricey at =
