itfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1S3lli-0008FV-MJ
for users@???; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 10:00:51 +0000
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 10:00:50 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20120303100049.GW4154@???>
References: <CAL4jrwThh+E3sZ9qbCKE1Mca5Gk2uQtM2onSpC2JH=Vdksa9yQ@???>
<20120303093844.GU4154@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GLp9dJVi+aaipsRk"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120303093844.GU4154@???>
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Sat,
03 Mar 2012 10:00:51 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andy@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd0.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RELAYS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] .bitfolk-rsync-filter - what filter do I need
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 10:00:52 -0000
--GLp9dJVi+aaipsRk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Robert,
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 09:38:44AM +0000, Andy Smith wrote:
> I'm afraid that it's set to only operate on items in the current
> directory, because of bugs in different versions of rsync as to what
> it does when multiple levels are considered.
By the way, if you want to test what is going to happen, the command
line on our side is:
rsync --filter=3D"dir-merge,n /.bitfolk-rsync-filter" -a \
--delete --numeric-ids --relative --delete-excluded \
--sparse --hard-links root@your-host:/backup-dir /blah/
so if you run that yourself (perhaps with -n and -v debugging)
you'll be able to replicate.
Cheers,
Andy
--=20
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
--GLp9dJVi+aaipsRk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREDAAYFAk9R69EACgkQIJm2TL8VSQsJbgCgxtqYmeadKYpfpGOVl2OVhnuN
i3IAoIJ3QC2Zm7YUvwG4ltTCIbN+SbYt
=fEqM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--GLp9dJVi+aaipsRk--
From sundancecloud@??? Mon Mar 12 23:53:03 2012
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f48.google.com ([209.85.215.48])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <sundancecloud@???>)
id 1S7F30-0002NZ-W0
for users@???; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 23:53:03 +0000
Received: by lagu2 with SMTP id u2so6167633lag.21
for <users@???>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:52:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=+JmIXabvCrYaN5XOz+JMzFSl1Q4vtdZGUpAfaI5qWj0=;
b=FR+biVcGSnalRsOD/rKGRbfAY6phLhqYxRLNW05mxXU0U1xa7bCjWU5AnRYsf5JlYb
gGPG9Z6JeX8ZSjNU2JIb+ypFQXjHUN1Spk8C7D0ZAThm4GJmE9H72FtaIj6FPnjdFINh
vrVy/n3ByIe/4+B1aY46A+nvBtYD7HzAATKccdx0N1/0GqkJIVvEPVyMLOYoyHBkSCLv
sXwRomHlvn
