t
bigger and more resilient than BitFolk's. That's also OK - maybe one
day I can compete with them on that score, but right now I am still
trying to cater to the hobbyist and small business and hope to come
in at a lower price than these services.
But if you or anyone else does have interest in putting more than 50
domains on BitFolk's servers, what sort of pricing and other things
would you like to see?
As far as pricing goes, OK let's start. What about first 50 domains
per VPS for free (as it is now), then every block of 50 domains
after that is =A30.99+VAT per month or =A39.99+VAT per year?
And I make the add/remove/disable/enable thing work first.
Cheers,
Andy
=B9 Having a VPS gives the technical basis, but I don't mind taking an
AXFR from anywhere.
=B2 I don't actually know any, but I assume there are plenty. I don't
mind if people want to suggest some.
--=20
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
--+9uAEI//NVSmpZEF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREDAAYFAk821lsACgkQIJm2TL8VSQvIDwCg2/UqeAcIopTv/60IJ/rAuZ9n
8NwAniByFCyzkElAG1Mypb5ZvNOt/fhl
=+m4K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--+9uAEI//NVSmpZEF--
From andyjpb@??? Sat Feb 11 23:13:22 2012
Received: from pavilion.ashurst.eu.org ([85.119.82.45])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <andyjpb@???>)
id 1RwM88-0007Rt-85; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:13:22 +0000
Received: from [31.185.58.229] (helo=[192.168.1.82])
by pavilion.ashurst.eu.org with esmtpsa
(TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <andyjpb@???>)
id 1RwM83-0000hw-20; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:13:17 +0000
Message-ID: <4F36F62A.2060001@???>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:13:46 +0000
From: Andy Bennett <andyjpb@???>
User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090707)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andy Smith <andy@???>
References: <4F352183.4070708@???> <2AEAD09C-4403-484D-95BB-D0B313FC5DCD@???> <4F354B64.7040405@???>
<4F35596E.3000906@???> <4F364EB3.3000604@???> <85f2071f1be555fe6f6a47eb6bafbb58.squirrel@???> <4F36BCE3.7080905@???>
<20120211191946.GG23380@???>
In-Reply-To: <20120211191946.GG23380@???>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="------------enigD61D0BF2CAB5DE993E8DD211"
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT
shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT Not all rules were run, due to a shortcircuited rule
* -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Sat,
11 Feb 2012 23:13:22 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 85.119.82.45
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andyjpb@???
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.bitfolk.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: users@???
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] IP address at Nominet's nameservers is wrong
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:13:22
