rom <andy@???>) id 1RwGPj-0007aO-O7
for users@???; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:07:07 +0000
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:07:07 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20120211170707.GX32046@???>
References: <CALdaYd06o3HAm_p+C7Qn87FJJbBftEiEm1FMBs_dDf4PkNF5yA@???>
<20120211152619.GF23380@???>
<CALdaYd3_K6W9s-E7ErUY68xXqFsB3rZxWEFCDAGBbvYRd+3CpA@???>
<20120211163138.GV32046@???>
<CALdaYd2FnyfHjn1b9CJ=RMeXXhomnmnnj4L3UoYjfDgJRmgthg@???>
<FA9E2C79-5B6B-4FF8-8F94-0D1310119158@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/7AFTq66AsXNQ7GX"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <FA9E2C79-5B6B-4FF8-8F94-0D1310119158@???>
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Sat,
11 Feb 2012 17:07:07 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andy@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd3.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RELAYS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Tor Obsfucation
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:07:08 -0000
--/7AFTq66AsXNQ7GX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Johnathon,
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 04:53:38PM +0000, Johnathon wrote:
> As far as I'm aware, this is a 'bridge' to the standard ssl/encrypted Tor=
network, not an exit node, so blocking 25/22 shouldn't be nessasary?
>=20
> Re exit nodes, I've seen white-hats using them to shutdown an entire botn=
et before. It's not just the blacks/greys who use Tor.
You would have to take a personal judgement call on whether you feel
the hassle of the bad traffic outweighs the benefit of the good.
I receive automated alerts nearly every day regarding Tor exit nodes
at BitFolk being used to connect to botnet C+C IRC channels. The
only reason why I don't pass *those* on is because I know the people
sending them don't expect a reply and I know my customer is just
going to go "uh, it's Tor". These are most likely not whitehats
shutting them down.
Maybe I *should* start passing those on too, just so that Tor exit
node operators can get some view on the scale of abuse they are
enabling along with all the free speech.
Cheers,
Andy
--/7AFTq66AsXNQ7GX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREDAAYFAk82oDsACgkQIJm2TL8VSQtXnQCg0dAd3tclfYhNtQK/fYCAtAQ+
3A4AoN7Mx14QtFgunhG7vEnJg9VaSrzM
=suZR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--/7AFTq66AsXNQ7GX--
From keithwilliamsnp@??? Sat Feb 11 18:06:46 2012
Received: from mail-lpp01m020-f176.google.com ([209.85.217.176])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <keithwilliamsnp@???>)
id 1RwHLS-000262-8G
for users@???; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:06:46 +0000
Received: by lboi15 with SMTP id i15so2685098lbo.21
for <users@???>; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:06:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed
