Re: [bitfolk] Lenny-to-Squeeze Upgrade Plan - 2nd opinions s…

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Andy Smith
Date:  
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Lenny-to-Squeeze Upgrade Plan - 2nd opinions sought!
> Registered until renewal date.
>=20
>     Name servers:
>         sub.example.co.uk           212.13.195.xx
>         top.example.co.uk           85.119.83.yy
>=20
>     WHOIS lookup made at 12:42:49 10-Feb-2012
>=20
>=20
> Note old IP address for sub.example.co.uk, even though the A record is =

clear it's the new address.
>=20
> Any suggestions as to what's going on gratefully received...
>=20
> Ian
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users@???
> https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users
>=20




From ian@??? Fri Feb 10 16:52:57 2012
Received: from semi-divine.com ([85.119.83.38] helo=topcat.semi-divine.com)
    by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
    (envelope-from <ian@???>) id 1RvtiT-00035F-FH
    for users@???; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:52:57 +0000
Received: from [192.168.0.23]
    (cpc3-nwrk4-2-0-cust250.12-1.cable.virginmedia.com [86.26.44.251])
    by topcat.semi-divine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24872842FC
    for <users@???>; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:52:53 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4F354B64.7040405@???>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:52:52 +0000
From: Ian <ian@???>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
    rv:9.0) Gecko/20111229 Thunderbird/9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: "users@???" <users@???>
References: <4F352183.4070708@???>
    <2AEAD09C-4403-484D-95BB-D0B313FC5DCD@???>
In-Reply-To: <2AEAD09C-4403-484D-95BB-D0B313FC5DCD@???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Fri,
    10 Feb 2012 16:52:57 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 85.119.83.38
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ian@???
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.bitfolk.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] IP address at Nominet's nameservers is wrong
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:52:57 -0000


Jon said:

> I suspect It's the DNS glue.. (an A record held at the parent).
> You'll need to update your delegation with the domain tag holder /
> registrar


As in who I registered it with, 123-Reg in this case?

Done, done and done again! (Over several days). The updates are getting
through - if I change the name of the other nameserver, and update the
details via the 123-Reg control panel, it's reflected instantly in the
Nominet listing, for example.

But it will not change this one.

Ian


From bitfolk-users@??? Fri Feb 10 17:07:12 2012
Recei