Re: [bitfolk] Lenny-to-Squeeze Upgrade Plan - 2nd opinions s…

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Andy Smith
Date:  
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Lenny-to-Squeeze Upgrade Plan - 2nd opinions sought!
j9FmovgWbUirJ5YVpTKQOAdrYGaoB1wAcphk
    67RMRaucbp7fJ/Bhqm3WBEPSwA8E8p2mK/xLBlrJxNL0eRNI0yxUSubeYIrWQoJYpilA
    sgZuZif5wCxz1KiJowJRm0CLLUkryUVcT6GhE=
Received: by 10.180.95.1 with SMTP id dg1mr9391048wib.21.1328882298284;
    Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:58:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.64.66] ([62.133.16.238])
    by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ho4sm3445970wib.3.2012.02.10.05.58.16
    (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
    Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:58:17 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Andrew Loughran <andylockran@???>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
From: Andy Loughran <andy@???>
In-Reply-To: <4F352183.4070708@???>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:58:15 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C937F545-B8BE-4047-9114-C86A183F8AA2@???>
References: <4F352183.4070708@???>
To: users@???
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Fri,
    10 Feb 2012 14:05:22 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.212.176
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andylockran@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
    spamd1.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.212.0/24
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
    RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
    SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
    low *      trust
    *      [209.85.212.176 listed in list.dnswl.org]
    * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
    * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
    *  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
    *      valid
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] IP address at Nominet's nameservers is wrong
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
    <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:05:27 -0000


Ian,

Looks like your name server is hardcoded to the old IP address.

You'll need to contact your provider and change your glue record to the =
new IP.

Regards,

Andy

On 10 Feb 2012, at 13:54, Ian wrote:

> I am having problems with this - despite updating them (again) today, =

it is still showing the old IP address for one of the nameservers:
>=20
>=20
> Here's the BIND record, with the domain name changed:
>=20
> $ttl 10800
> example.co.uk.    IN    SOA    sub.example.co.uk. =

example.gmail.com. (
>             2012021001
>             7200
>             3600
>             604800
>             10800 )
> example.co.uk.    IN    NS    sub.example.co.uk.
> example.co.uk.    IN    NS    top