Thanks to all who replied.=A0 I decided to wait out the 48hrs left on the l=
ocal nameserver (Hugo's tip) and then the problem sorted itself. :)
Valuable tips might like these ought to be compiled into a sysadmin pocketb=
ook: 'wisdom from bitfolk'.
Cheers!
--- On Tue, 2/7/12, Hugo Mills <hugo-bf@???> wrote:
From: Hugo Mills <hugo-bf@???>
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Renumbering: resolver not working? still points to 2=
12.x, instead of 85.y on >=3D1 machine
To: "Max B" <txtmax@???>
Cc: users@???
Received: Tuesday, February 7, 2012, 9:59 PM
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 12:56:19PM -0800, Max B wrote:
> thanks for everyone's response to my wiki proposal.=A0 I hadn't
> intended a flame war, and may respond selectively at a future date,
> when for instance, I am not faced with a puzzle, as follows. > dig returns the correct value 85.y on my VPS.
>=20
> dig returns the old address 212.x elsewhere (at work).
=A0=A0=A0Two things you can look at: dig tells you the TTL remaining on any
entry when you query it. For example:=20
