application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREDAAYFAk8ywTsACgkQIJm2TL8VSQt6ggCdFjHnoFqmGXKeST6d0LZ8s0f6
NtUAoMLT/KXFJA401XCmZEW72KjysAYt
=khcF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--BQstn4t8nd6twlV3--
From zen57162@??? Wed Feb 08 19:45:17 2012
Received: from smarthost02.mail.zen.net.uk ([212.23.3.141])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <zen57162@???>) id 1RvDS8-0002cc-Ud
for users@???; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:45:17 +0000
Received: from [82.70.125.126] (helo=benden.pern)
by smarthost02.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <zen57162@???>) id 1RvDS6-0001ax-K4
for users@???; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:45:14 +0000
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 19:45:14 +0000
From: john lewis <zen57162@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20120208194514.15a1c9b6@???>
In-Reply-To: <B7981BCE-1A6E-421E-86DD-C88272FCB311@???>
References: <1328648179.92645.YahooMailClassic@???>
<20120207215941.GF19330@???>
<20120208121403.3af4143a@???>
<B7981BCE-1A6E-421E-86DD-C88272FCB311@???>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.9; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-Smarthost02-IP: [82.70.125.126]
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Wed,
08 Feb 2012 19:45:16 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 212.23.3.141
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: zen57162@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd1.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS13037 212.23.0.0/19
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
no * trust * [212.23.3.141 listed in list.dnswl.org]
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Renumbering: resolver not working? still points to
212.x, instead of 85.y on >=1 machine
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:45:17 -0000
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 12:16:29 +0000
Andy Loughran <andylockran@???> wrote:
> For your domain I get:
>
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> startx.co.uk. 86397 IN A 212.13.194.129
>
> ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
> startx.co.uk. 86301 IN NS ns0.zen.co.uk.
> startx.co.uk. 86301 IN NS ns1.zen.co.uk.
>
> ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
> ns0.zen.co.uk. 13613 IN A 212.23.8.1
> ns1.zen.co.uk. 13613 IN A 212.23.3.1
>
> This looks like an old IP. Have you updated your DNS at zen?
I have done so earlier, I'd forgotten that Andy had mentioned this need
in one of his very early emails about re-numbering but found it when I
looked.
It is just going to take time for the change to propagate. One odd
thing is that I can now access the databases from my linux system but
my wife cannot as yet from her WinXP system despite both of us being on
the same local network here at home.
At the moment she is more concerned that the URL for her database is
all over facebook and can be found by googling when she was hoping it
wouldn't get spread worldwide. Trying to explain to her that nothing
can be kept
