000DA-7e
for users@???; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 00:53:23 +0000
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 00:53:23 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20120206005323.GO23380@???>
References: <CAJ4ZL51j+uyqtW+u_Q8gCQcF+HkN-ZXDSOfbNsv6YKdyv6a6fw@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5PPnVwj6ulmYFu5t"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJ4ZL51j+uyqtW+u_Q8gCQcF+HkN-ZXDSOfbNsv6YKdyv6a6fw@???>
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Mon,
06 Feb 2012 00:53:23 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andy@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd2.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RELAYS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Reminder: Debian Lenny support ends tomorrow (Monday)
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 00:53:23 -0000
--5PPnVwj6ulmYFu5t
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Graham,
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 05:38:56PM +0000, Graham Bleach wrote:
> I note that my root filesystem is on /dev/sda1. Aside from changing my
> fstab to use UUIDs, are there any other special considerations for the
> upgrade since I'm using /dev/sda* as opposed to /dev/xvda?
If you have a /dev/sda1 witout a /dev/sda then the update-grub
script will probably complain and be unable to rewrite your menu.lst
for the new kernel, failing the installation of that package.
You could manually fix up the menu.lst and it would work fine, but I
advise putting in a support ticket to get the block devices changed
to /dev/xvda (with your FS directly on it).
Cheers,
Andy
--=20
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
--5PPnVwj6ulmYFu5t
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREDAAYFAk8vJIMACgkQIJm2TL8VSQtYdACcD3o2w+bVrpECQ/psd5Z6GXl2
xqgAn3gaa/wfi9/5rUtnzMjSjs3I0j+7
=iCUk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--5PPnVwj6ulmYFu5t--
From andy@??? Mon Feb 06 01:02:27 2012
Received: from andy by mail.bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1RuCyR-0000d2-51
for users@???; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 01:02:27 +0000
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 01:02:27 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20120206010227.GQ23380@???>
References: <4F2EE387.4000707@???>
<20120205202531.GC1936@???>
<20120205203549.GD1936@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="w3gPeeaTISh83WAP"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120205203549.GD1936@???>
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Mon,
06 Feb 2012 01:02:27 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andy@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd1.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RELAYS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] VPS renumbering failure
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 01:02:27 -0000
--w3gPeeaTISh83WAP
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Di
