<div class=3D"im"><br>
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 07:35:37AM +0000, Gavin Westwood wrote:<br>
> On 26/01/2012 03:30, S P wrote:<br>
> > I got your point about "ip addr del ...", but could you=
help out with<br>
> > "... then remove from network configuration ..."?<br>
> > <snip><br>
<br>
</div>I mean that you should adjust the configuration files that the<br>
system uses on boot to set up its networking so that the old IP<br>
addresses don't come back.<br>
<div class=3D"im"><br>
> If you are running a Debian-based distro, then you should be able to<b=
r>
> find you IP address configuration in /etc/network/interfaces and be ab=
le<br>
> to change it there.<br>
<br>
</div>=85and if you are running a RHEL-based one then it would be in<br>
/etc/sysconfig/network and /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0<br>
<div class=3D"im HOEnZb"><br>
Cheers,<br>
Andy<br>
<br>
--<br>
<a href=3D"
http://bitfolk.com/" target=3D"_blank">
http://bitfolk.com/</a> -=
- No-nonsense VPS hosting<br>
<br>
</div><div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5">_____________________________=
__________________<br>
users mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"
mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com">users@???</a><br>
<a href=3D"
https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users" target=3D"_bla=
nk">
https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>
--f46d043be0886128c204b777bdcd--
From sundancecloud@??? Fri Jan 27 04:09:46 2012
Received: from mail-vx0-f176.google.com ([209.85.220.176])
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <sundancecloud@???>)
id 1Rqd8D-0007QZ-J6
for users@???; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 04:09:46 +0000
Received: by vcbfl13 with SMTP id fl13so1287998vcb.21
for <users@???>; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:09:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type; bh=1pmV4QrzgLSPEoLrUWxsrhUvNoPOYA76n2vagG0F8uQ=;
b=xUXuTc2TsMoWQO+iBfcCnDmxNaH/gboTTZX+3MaBQ7S0CWYYFsTuqadnjUbOOTNH72
iPaIsDxa3bffDiZyAsNlGDs1oymmf+Fhq/BDvWTjYaIbIEqU188jATzDaMMWpnKF7nVj
QphI2ZurNGtr/mBLigT9PN6vYmAE7OH1Pql/Q=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.231.129 with SMTP id jq1mr2556519vcb.59.1327637378903;
Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:09:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.201.137 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:09:38 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20120126103743.GJ23380@???>
References: <CAF=eGRi_CyUsmuN1AqG3q0T=mwTm2MZfbEjqCW-Dz3KTKkipiw@???>
<20120122115457.GA23380@???>
<CAL7LUj9u2usZUmt+Wx5XAms5JOa+tKbw_2qVKMUepUYDMB+Vdw@???>
<4F210249.2070506@???>
<20120126103743.GJ23380@???>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:09:38 -0500
Message-ID: <CAL7LUj9p0vh+t4Jmv71fEG1EHuEWWgL8zRDrSFoRYEyw89NPOQ@???>
From: S P <sundancecloud@???>
To: users@???
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9cdc5235c2d9e04b77aaa99
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Fri,
27 Jan 2012 04:09:45 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.220.176
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: sundancecloud@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd1.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
low * trust
* [209.85.220.176 listed in list.dnswl.org]
* -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
* 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's * domain
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
* 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
* valid
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Finding out old IP users
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 04:09:46 -0000
--14dae9cdc5235c2d9e04b77aaa99
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Andy,
I still have a related problem. After removing the old IP (212....) and
rebooting.
-- VPN into the new IP (85...)
-- ifconfig still shows the old IP in ppp0 !
I have verified from 2 different client computers, but ppp0 always shows
the old IP.
I have verified that no firewall nat rules reference the old IP.
I have rebooted the VPS a couple of times.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Sandy
# ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr ...
inet addr:*85.119.82.244* Bcast:85.119.87.255 Mask:255.255.248.=
0
inet6 addr: 2001:ba8:1f1:f1be::2/64 Scope:Global
inet6 addr: fe80::216:5eff:fe00:236/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
ppp0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
inet addr:*212.13.194.244* P-t-P:10.1.0.1 Mask:255.255.255.255
UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1496 Metric:1
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 5:37 AM, Andy Smith <andy@???> wrote:
> Hi Sandy,
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 07:35:37AM +0000, Gavin Westwood wrote:
> > On 26/01/2012 03:30, S P wrote:
> > > I got your point about "ip addr del ...", but could you help out with
> > > "... then remove from network configuration ..."?
> > > <snip>
>
> I mean that you should adjust the configuration files that the
> system uses on boot to set up its networking so that the old IP
> addresses don't come back.
>
> > If you are running a Debian-based distro, then you should be able to
> > find you IP address configuration in /etc/network/interfaces and be abl=
e
> > to change it there.
>
> =85and if you are running a R
