k.com
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQldL8PqY/+3zyxHA+SI/NQADTiYofENBzZiR7NNZO69ML8o3Tv4E1sGjAG4ZG4UEIhO4RcC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Sun,
22 Jan 2012 09:04:36 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 64.18.1.208
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mike@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd2.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN: AS26910 64.18.1.0/24
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
DKIM_VALID_AU, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
* medium trust
* [64.18.1.208 listed in list.dnswl.org]
* -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's * domain
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
* 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
* valid
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] RAM requirements for CentOS 6.x / Scientific Linux
6.x install
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 09:04:37 -0000
On 22 January 2012 07:07, Andy Smith <andy@???> wrote:
> I can't find a simple way to override that check (please let me know
> if you know of one), and I'm not quite ready to increase the default
> RAM allocation to 512MiB.
The workaround for low RAM in the past was to set the needed_ram
variable in the anaconda script to 0. I haven't done that since RHEL
5, though, so it may not be the same in 6.
Mike
From andy@??? Sun Jan 22 09:09:07 2012
Received: from andy by mail.bitfolk.com with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <andy@???>) id 1RotQB-0002MC-84
for users@???; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 09:09:07 +0000
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 09:09:07 +0000
From: Andy Smith <andy@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20120122090907.GW23380@???>
References: <20120122070717.GU23380@???>
<CAOGWvnHDqQvscgO9hrtf7V5uhGHL0ix8gGPmT3y38tW2=pQK7w@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAOGWvnHDqQvscgO9hrtf7V5uhGHL0ix8gGPmT3y38tW2=pQK7w@???>
OpenPGP: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
X-URL: http://strugglers.net/wiki/User:Andy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Sun,
22 Jan 2012 09:09:07 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: andy@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd1.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RELAYS shortcircuit=no
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] RAM requirements for CentOS 6.x / Scientific
Linux 6.x install
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitf
