=
e it to use dialog</div><div>or something that should fit your terminal =3F=
</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I believe the problem is tha=
t in a xen-console you get a =22linux=22-type </div><div>terminal, which =
appears to be rather limited.</div><div><br></div><div>=24 echo =24TERM</=
div><div><br></div><div>while in the console returns =22linux=22 at least=
in my private xen-setup.</div><div>I don't know if it is possible to cha=
nge this.</div><div><br></div><div>- OM</div><div><br></div><div>=5F=5F=5F=
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F</div><div>users=
mailing list</div><div><a href=3D=22mailto:users=40lists.bitfolk.com=22>=
users=40lists.bitfolk.com</a></div><div><a href=3D=22https://lists.bitfol=
k.com/mailman/listinfo/users=22>https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinf=
o/users</a></div></div></div></span>
=20
=20
=20
=20
</blockquote>
=20
<div>
<br>
</div>
--4f145da7_507ed7ab_1fc2--
From olemd@??? Mon Jan 16 19:58:16 2012
Received: from [2001:ba8:1f1:f102:216:5eff:fe00:17f] (helo=glemt.net
ident=Debian-exim)
by mail.bitfolk.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <olemd@???>) id 1Rmsh5-0003Xd-SV
for users@???; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 19:58:15 +0000
Received: from olemd by glemt.net with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <olemd@???>) id 1Rmsh5-0004uT-2J
for users@???; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:58:15 +0100
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:58:15 +0100
From: Ole-Morten Duesund <olemd@???>
To: users@???
Message-ID: <20120116195815.GA18775@???>
References: <4E3EF573.2050101@???> <20110807203357.GE5935@???>
<4E40414E.90704@???> <20110808201035.GK5935@???>
<4E41B36B.7090002@???> <4F133E16.5070303@???>
<f482d5932a6954261c686ea1a8f5fa0c.squirrel@???>
<20120116125224.GA5234@???> <4F142058.9060501@???>
<8D8D2067C75E4F8F9964177B2D7A2D86@???>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8D8D2067C75E4F8F9964177B2D7A2D86@???>
X-Message-Flag: Outlook is bad for you, use mutt.
Jabber-ID: olemd@???
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-bitfolk.com-Metrics-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for
2001:ba8:1f1:f102:216:5eff:fe00:17f (failed)
X-Virus-Scanner: Scanned by ClamAV on mail.bitfolk.com at Mon,
16 Jan 2012 19:58:15 +0000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:ba8:1f1:f102:216:5eff:fe00:17f
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: olemd@???
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
spamd0.lon.bitfolk.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-ASN:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT
shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT Not all rules were run, due to a shortcircuited rule
* -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.bitfolk.com)
Subject: Re: [bitfolk] Lenny-to-Squeeze Upgrade Plan - 2nd opinions sought!
X-BeenThere: users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users of BitFolk hosting <users.lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.bitfolk.com/lurker/list/users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:users@lists.bitfolk.com>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@lists.bitfolk.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 19:58:16 -0000
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 05:25:59PM +0000, Aaron B. Russell wrote:
> As a temporary fix you could just:
> $ export TERM=xterm
>
> Though that'd only persist until you logout/back in.
The problem with that is that the underlying terminal-code presumably
only supports "linux" and not "xterm", whatever the differences may be.
I suspect the only way to really fix this lies somewhere in the Xen
codebase.
- OM
> On Monday, January 16, 2012 at 1:04pm, Ole-Morten Duesund wrote:
>
> > On 16/01/12 13:52, Rodrigo Campos wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 09:44:57AM -0000, Mathew Newton wrote:
> > > > 
