12 Nov
2015
12 Nov
'15
7:28 p.m.
Hi,
There's been quite a run of gmail believing that all email from our
Request Tracker was spam and automatically filing it into your spam
folder.
So, if you use gmail please could you have a look in your spam
folder and see if there is any bitfolk email in there, and if so
please do mark it as "not spam".
Meanwhile I have added DKIM, SPF and DMARC to emails from
support(a)rt.bitfolk.com so hopefully this is less likely to happen in
future.
Cheers,
Andy
--
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
_______________________________________________
announce mailing list
announce(a)lists.bitfolk.com
https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/announce
12 Nov
12 Nov
7:37 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 12/11/2015 19:28, Andy Smith wrote:
Meanwhile I have added DKIM, SPF and DMARC to emails
from
support(a)rt.bitfolk.com so hopefully this is less likely to happen
in future.
That seems to have done the trick. None of the ones I received earlier
were detected as spam.
Mike
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iEYEARECAAYFAlZE6mYACgkQ/kpNbHCQHr6rRwCglZLFR6xQJsO/S8yxI0AO182i
ZEsAoKeVFY7WMp7WIDBfPE0KaHzMKBLx
=2teK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
7:47 p.m.
New subject: gmail thinks/thought all bitfolk support email is/was spam
Hi Mike,
As it happens your email ended up in the gmail spam folder for me.
Google says the email didn't meet the authentication requirements for
zanker.org.
Cheers,
Roger
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 7:37 PM, Mike Zanker <mike(a)zanker.org> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 12/11/2015 19:28, Andy Smith wrote:
Meanwhile I have added DKIM, SPF and DMARC to
emails from
support(a)rt.bitfolk.com so hopefully this is less likely to happen
in future.
That seems to have done the trick. None of the ones I received earlier
were detected as spam.
Mike
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iEYEARECAAYFAlZE6mYACgkQ/kpNbHCQHr6rRwCglZLFR6xQJsO/S8yxI0AO182i
ZEsAoKeVFY7WMp7WIDBfPE0KaHzMKBLx
=2teK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)lists.bitfolk.com
https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users
7:49 p.m.
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 07:47:49PM +0000, Roger Light wrote:
As it happens your email ended up in the gmail spam
folder for me.
Google says the email didn't meet the authentication requirements for
zanker.org.
gmail is fun, isn't it? Welcome to my world, only it is with people
I need to pay me. :)
Cheers,
Andy
--
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
7:56 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 12/11/2015 19:49, Andy Smith wrote:
gmail is fun, isn't it? Welcome to my world, only
it is with
people I need to pay me. :)
I suspect that it failed SPF because it went via the mail list. DKIM
should be OK but I'm also using DMARC so it will have 'failed' overall.
Mike
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iEYEARECAAYFAlZE7woACgkQ/kpNbHCQHr6VdgCeI19K8oR5VvEUh2RP0Gv3gfXJ
9CIAoKMosZz+dSwHE9/a1n76sNSDWOwT
=+/4S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
8:02 p.m.
New subject: gmail thinks/thought all bitfolk support email is/was spam
Test from gmail controlled domain using soft fail
On 12 November 2015 at 19:56, Mike Zanker <mike(a)zanker.org> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 12/11/2015 19:49, Andy Smith wrote:
gmail is fun, isn't it? Welcome to my world,
only it is with
people I need to pay me. :)
I suspect that it failed SPF because it went via the mail list. DKIM
should be OK but I'm also using DMARC so it will have 'failed' overall.
Mike
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iEYEARECAAYFAlZE7woACgkQ/kpNbHCQHr6VdgCeI19K8oR5VvEUh2RP0Gv3gfXJ
9CIAoKMosZz+dSwHE9/a1n76sNSDWOwT
=+/4S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)lists.bitfolk.com
https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users
10:51 p.m.
On 12/11/2015 21:47, Roger Light wrote:
Hi Mike,
As it happens your email ended up in the gmail spam folder for me.
Google says the email didn't meet the authentication requirements for
zanker.org.
Cheers,
Roger
Beware of similar messages if sending to gmail over IPV6. They require
all the bells and whistles (DKIM, SPF) to even accept mail over IPV6. So
always remember to check if the mail server has it enabled.
--GM
13 Nov
13 Nov
12:45 a.m.
** G. Miliotis <corfiot(a)elementality.org> [2015-11-12 22:51]:
On 12/11/2015 21:47, Roger Light wrote:
** end quote [G. Miliotis]
This ^^. A while back, after using IPv6 on my mail server for a while, I found
that mail to Gmail and NTLWorld address (probably others) were being silently
dropped. It seems that Google had implemented/enforced a stricter policy on
IPv6 connections. As a result I spent a while making sure all the DNS entries
were good and creating a SPF record. Thankfully I created SPF records using the
TXT and proper SPF options in DNS because it seems as though the custom SPF
record has been depricated and a TXT one should be used now. That didn't help
sort out the new problem with my mail being filed as spam. This only seemed to
be happening on mail sent through my Mailman lists, and for some reason not all
- once in a while they would get through. I hope I've found the new issue now
as I've spotted that the reverse entry for the IPv6 address had a minor typo in
it and all is working fine now - fingers crossed! Getting mail to Google
addresses can be an education at times!
--
Paul Tansom | Aptanet Ltd. | https://www.aptanet.com/ | 023 9238 0001
Vice Chair, FSB Portsmouth & SE Hampshire Branch | http://www.fsb.org.uk/
=============================================================================
Registered in England | Company No: 4905028 | Registered Office: Ralls House,
Parklands Business Park, Forrest Road, Denmead, Waterlooville, Hants, PO7 6XP
Hi Mike,
As it happens your email ended up in the gmail spam folder for me.
Google says the email didn't meet the authentication requirements for
zanker.org.
Cheers,
Roger
Beware of similar messages if sending to gmail over IPV6. They require all
the bells and whistles (DKIM, SPF) to even accept mail over IPV6. So always
remember to check if the mail server has it enabled.
3080
days inactive
3081
days old
7 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Andy Smith -
G. Miliotis -
Mike Zanker -
Paul Tansom -
Peter Collins -
Roger Light