Paul,

this may be obvious, but have you reset the network?
debian:
% /etc/init.d/networking reload

BTW, shouldn't 85.119.82.67/32 be 85.119.82.67/21?
netmask for your secondary address is inconsistent with the netmask for your primary eth0.

HTH, Cheers!

--- On Sun, 2/5/12, Paul Stimpson <paul@stimpsonfamily.co.uk> wrote:

From: Paul Stimpson <paul@stimpsonfamily.co.uk>
Subject: [bitfolk] VPS renumbering failure
To: users@lists.bitfolk.com
Received: Sunday, February 5, 2012, 8:16 PM

Hi,

Due to a punishing workload, I left my renumbering to the last minute and it's not worked right.

Here is my new /etc/network/interfaces:

> auto lo
> iface lo inet loopback
>
> auto eth0
> iface eth0 inet static
>     address 85.119.82.73
>     netmask 255.255.248.0
>     gateway 85.119.80.1
>
> auto eth0:1
> iface eth0:1 inet static
>     address 85.119.82.67
>     netmask 255.255.255.255
>
> auto eth0:2
> iface eth0:2 inet static
>     address 212.13.194.73
>     netmask 255.255.255.255
>
> auto eth0:3
> iface eth0:3 inet static
>     address 212.13.194.67
>     netmask 255.255.255.255


ip -4 addr show dev eth0

> 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 1000
>     inet 85.119.82.73/21 brd 85.119.87.255 scope global eth0
>     inet 85.119.82.67/32 brd 85.255.255.255 scope global eth0:1
>     inet 212.13.194.73/32 brd 212.13.194.255 scope global eth0:2
>     inet 212.13.194.67/32 brd 212.13.194.255 scope global eth0:3

ip -4 route show

> 10.26.0.2 dev tun0  proto kernel  scope link  src 10.26.0.1
> 10.26.0.0/24 via 10.26.0.2 dev tun0
> 85.119.80.0/21 dev eth0  proto kernel  scope link  src 85.119.82.73
> default via 85.119.80.1 dev eth0

/etc/resolv.conf

> nameserver 85.119.80.232
> nameserver 85.119.80.233

I can still ping and ssh the old 212 addresses. When I'm logged in, I can't ping 85.119.80.1 and dig says that there are no DNS servers available. I can ping both 212 addresses from outside but neither of the 85 addresses.

I'd be really grateful if someone would point out my stupid and obvious mistake.

Thanks,
Paul.







_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@lists.bitfolk.com
https://lists.bitfolk.com/mailman/listinfo/users